Most of us were hired for our judgment, not our prose. We can hold a tangle of regulatory, operational, and commercial issues in our heads and reason through it cleanly. Then we have to explain it, and the explanation is where good lawyers lose the room. That gap between strong analysis and clear communication is what separates the lawyers who get invited back from the ones who do not.
Laura Frederick hosted Valerie Madamba, a legal presentation coach and strategist and former regulatory attorney in food, drug, and life sciences, and Amanda Haverstick, a legal writing coach who spent about twenty years in big law and wrote the legal writing primer Dear One L. Both came at the same problem from different sides, the spoken and the written, with years of teaching lawyers what works and what does not. Their advice stayed close to the in-house experience, where the business priority shapes everything about how we communicate.
The conversation covered how to structure your thinking before you draft, how to present for a decision rather than just for awareness, how to adjust for the audience and even the device they read on, how to turn dense analysis into stories and examples, and the small grammar habits that quietly make legal writing harder to follow. It closed on holding a room when the stakes are high and on writing to a single specific reader instead of an abstract audience.
Here are our top ten takeaways from the speakers' comments during the webinar:
Write the beginning last. The order in which you figure something out is not the order your reader should receive it. Draft the whole thing messy, then step back and ask what the big points actually are, then restructure around them. Amanda's point about teaching yourself as you write is worth sitting with, because that milquetoast opening paragraph is a sign you started writing before you knew what you thought. Keep a working table of contents so you always know where the document is headed.
Match your simplicity to the idea's complexity. The harder the concept, the simpler the prose has to get. Use shorter words and stop loading multiple ideas into one sentence. The curse of knowledge means we forget the reader has not lived with this subject the way we have, so our drafts assume a familiarity they do not have. Simplicity here is not dumbing down, it is removing the friction between your analysis and their understanding.
Present for a decision, not for awareness. Before you build anything, answer one question. What is the single action you want this group to be able to take when you are done. If you only raise awareness of the legal issue without a clear ask, the meeting ends and people wonder what it was for. Start with the decision and close with it, because tangents are guaranteed and the decision is the thing everyone stays accountable to.
Frame risk the way the business does. Lawyers treat risk as a reason to stop. The business takes risk constantly. Do not just list risks, categorize them as the business would, by liability or regulatory exposure, and pair each one with how it can be mitigated. Then set up a real choice between options with different upside and relative risk. That shift moves you from gatekeeper to advisor, which is the role that actually gets you invited back.
Do not presume you know how the business should decide. We see risk through our own lens. The business may be weighing budget, a CEO directive, or pressures we never hear about. Our job is to hand over the factors to weigh, not to collapse the decision into A plus B equals C. Tailoring advice this way takes more discipline than delivering a verdict, but it respects that the call is theirs.
Design for the device, not just the room. Think about where the document will actually be read. A phone or tablet changes what works, which is why footnotes have stopped working well in briefs and why a dense slide that looks fine on your laptop is unreadable when someone opens it on their phone. The format is part of the message. We default to designing for the screen in front of us instead of the one the audience will use.
Translate analysis through small, relatable stories. A thorough analysis is the raw material, not the deliverable. The translation step is examples, and in-house lawyers have an unusual supply of contextualized ones that do not require calling anyone out. Skip the epic TED-style transformation and use a range of small stories, because that is what gives a concept like a risk spectrum real color and meaning. Smaller and more relatable beats cinematic.
Fix the four sentence-level habits that lose readers. Keep the subject and verb next to each other so the reader is not hunting for the verb while holding the subject in mind. Write subject-verb-object in the active voice, which is clearer and shorter. Catch dangling modifiers where the opening phrase does not match the first noun after it. Cut ambiguous words like such and same that sound professional but create confusion. The underlying test is whether two reasonable people could read the sentence two ways.
When objections hit, get curious before you defend. High stakes conversations trigger fight or flight, and the instinct is to defend your recommendation on the spot. Restate the objection, confirm you understood it, and ask what is driving it, because the motivation behind a question is usually pertinent to the decision on the table. Preparing for likely objections in advance, framed commercially and practically rather than just legally, is what makes that composure possible.
Write to one person and test it on a beginner. A document gets clearer when you picture a single specific reader and answer the question they would ask next. Use a first-year law student as your litmus test, someone with a little background who is genuinely trying to follow you, because a beginner will flag the leaps in logic faster than a senior reader who assumes they should already understand it and stays quiet.
Subscribe to Stay in the Loop
Whether you joined this webinar live or are catching up now, the How to Contract weekly newsletter keeps you close to the practical side of the work, with links to upcoming webinars and recaps like this one. Subscribe now so the insights reach you even when your calendar does not let you attend.
