Here’s what’s included in this week’s newsletter:

MY QUICK TAKE
Sometimes there's nothing to negotiate. It's just a risk decision.
When you work with contracts, you are are trained to find the path to a better result. So much of our work is reframing, redirecting, and bending a deal toward a better outcome. But sometimes you face problems that require a decision. You have bad choices in front of you and your job in those moments is to make the call.
AI CONTRACT LESSON
How to draft input data definitions in AI contracts
When you define input data in an AI product contract, you are doing a lot. The one defined term sets what the customer keeps protected and what the vendor may reuse or train on. If you get it wrong, as our speakers said, the provision that says “do not train on my data” may not protect what you think it does. Laura Belmont and David Sclar explain how they approach these definitions and traps to avoid. Comes with a two-page PDF desk reference and a 12-minute video segment.
FREE CONTRACT TRAINING
Upcoming CLE webinars and free ticket giveaway to attendees!
Register to an upcoming webinar by clicking the link below:
Tuesday, July 14 - Managing Contract Risk and Policies in Small Legal Departments
Thursday, July 16 - Fundamentals of Creating Playbooks
Tuesday, July 21 - EU Contracting for US Lawyers
Wednesday, July 22 - Drafting AI Confidentiality Provisions
Thursday, July 23 - Leading on Major Contracts and Deals for Small Legal Departments
OUR SPONSOR
Get 10% Off Spellbook: the first end-to-end AI system for contracts
Our sponsor, Spellbook, is offering the contracts community 10% off your first year's subscription if you attend a Spellbook-sponsored webinar or fill out this form.
That includes access to Autonomous Contract Management (ACM), the first AI system that powers contracts end-to-end.
From the moment a deal lands in your inbox to the day it renews years later, ACM supports every step by doing real, routine work for you.
Intake & Triage: When you sit down in the morning, ACM has already pulled in new deals, triaged your contract queue, and applied redlines against your standards.
Continuous Sync: During negotiation, ACM works in the background to sync emails and versions of every agreement so your latest draft and deal context are accessible in a single spot.
Repository: After signature, ACM stores agreements and makes them searchable for future questions, renewals, and risk review.
Claim your 10% discount here.
Learn more about ACM here.
MEME OF THE WEEK
When your KPIs include attaching documents

If employers were honest in their job descriptions, this one would be at the top of the listed job duties for every contract-related job post.
That leads me to think that maybe companies should add it as a KPI for our promotions and bonuses. I'm thinking, "attached at least 20 PDF copies of linked documents and policies on 80% or more of the contracts processed." If that doesn't earn a bigger bonus, I don't know what would.
What do you think the KPI should say?
CONTRACT TIPS
Drafting termination for convenience provisions
Today's contract tip is about drafting termination for convenience provisions.
These provisions allow a party to terminate the contract for any reason, even if there is no breach.
Many companies prefer to use this approach rather than terminate for cause.
I remember being surprised that the senior lawyers advised a client to use this approach in the face of a ton of documentation and evidence of the counterparty's unprovoked breach. I now understand the wisdom of it.
The reason many lawyers advise their clients to terminate for convenience is to avert the distraction and cost of a potential wrongful termination claim. The cost may be less than the potential litigation over whether there was a breach.
I think of it as akin to offering the counterparty an opportunity to save face during negotiations.
While less risky than termination for cause, termination for convenience is not risk-free.
Many contracts require the terminating party to pay the other party something if there is a termination for convenience. The amount to be paid is often the subject of heavy negotiation.
Vendors want to receive payment for all work performed and goods delivered, any sunk costs that can’t be recouped (such as cancellation fees), and their overhead and lost profit.
Customers want the vendor to stop work immediately, mitigate costs, and deliver any works in progress.
Where they end up depends on their negotiation.
One last point - make sure you evaluate if the early termination fee is a liquidated damage (LD). If you set a fixed payment unrelated to actual damages, it may be and you'll need to include all the other language required for LD provisions.
What other advice would you add that new lawyers should know about termination for convenience provisions?
Let us know if you have any questions or feedback by replying to this email or email us directly at [email protected]. We are so grateful for our amazing contracts community.
All my best,
Laura Frederick, Founder and CEO @ How to Contract









